resign

Blog, Essays, Monishots

Abaribe metaphorically told the North to wake up.

If you are starving and young and in search of answers as to why your life is so difficult, fundamentalism can be alluring. We know this for a fact because former members of Boko Haram have admitted it: They offer impressionable young people money and the promise of food, while the group’s mentors twist their minds with fanaticism.~ Muhammadu Buhari Achebe wrote that “The trouble with Nigeria has become the subject of our small talk in much the same way as the weather is for the English”. Nigerians love arguing because there is never a drought of issues for a rapacious audience to discuss in this country. We are often cajoled by flowery catchphrases and hashtags such as change, Biafra or nothing, restructuring, our-mumu-don-do, red card, #RevolutionNow etc. It is one week one new story, ranging from the ingenious to the utterly absurd. The current debate sparked by Senator Abaribe’s call for President Buhari’s resignation over the worsening insecurity bears the same hallmarks. We will immerse ourselves in the velitation by taking sides. Dissipate humongous energy on expletives and end up in ground zero after the whole rigmarole. Unsurprisingly the senators and indeed the citizens from the northern states ravaged by the crisis are the ones who have joined the presidency in taking umbrage at the senator’s remarks. While the vocal minority comprising mostly of southerners on various media platforms have stoutly risen to his defence. Senator Abaribe is not a stranger to controversy. He is a courageous and experienced lawmaker who presented himself as a surety for the fugitive IPOB leader when his colleagues from the South East baulked. Moreover, he is the leader of the opposition and is well within his rights to make such a demand after all President Buhari himself once asked former President Jonathan to resign on the same account and nobody threw the kitchen sink at him. However, I believe that we are not having the right debate. How will Buhari’s resignation impact on the orgy of violence we are currently witnessing? In a nation where everything including the security of lives has been politicised the answer pretty much depends on one’s prism of perception. The president’s fanatic fans will argue that the reverse could be the case while critics who absurdly claim that he is behind the insecurity will claim that his resignation will put end to it. Yet some have stated that he should resign first. But here is the thing. You and I know the president will do no such thing, more so when the call is from a senator whose region contributed little to his emergence and eventual reelection. Even Abaribe himself knows this too, so why are we chasing rabbits? One would have thought the realistic discourse would be around the solutions to stymie the worsening insecurity, especially in the northern region. And this brings me to the meat of my thesis. The north is a region that negates its enormous natural endowments. Despite the existence of huge human and material resources, the region is plagued by abject poverty, illiteracy and terrorism. If you have lived in the northern part of the country you will better appreciate why it currently serves as the crucible of the turbulence across the nation. Out of the six geopolitical zones, the three in the north have the worst indices of poverty with 77% for the North-West, 76% and 67% for the North-East and North-Central respectively. The region is a vast land, so vast that you can drive over 30km without any sign of human habitation. I can’t think of any road in the South East where you will drive for 5km without coming across a storey building. That gives you an idea of the disparity in development between both regions and why the insurgency easily thrives in the north. A former Governor of Borno state aptly captured the region’s debilitating poverty and developmental imbalance between the north and the south when he remarked that: “Unemployment in the north is extremely high. Nigeria is a country of two nations, the South is much more stable and prosperous, the north, on the other hand, is in a poverty trap. In Nigeria, poverty wears a northern cap; if you are looking for a poor man, get somebody wearing a northern cap.” Of course, Shettima is not alone in his position. The outspoken Emir of Kano Alhaji Sanusi Lamido has often come under fire from his tribesmen for saying the truth. Mirroring President Buhari’s quote at the beginning of this piece, Sanusi once suggested that Islam faces extinction in the region because, “if poverty continues in the north, Islam will disappear from the north. Poverty can lead to disbelief”.  Light as they may appear these words become more worrisome in context when you consider that despite the varying opinions about the Boko Haram insurgency, the sect actually emerged as an opposition element to the political system dominated by corrupt elites. Mohammed Yusuf recruited from the streets, preying on the downtrodden with a twisted version of the doctrine that promised a better future. Yet we are discussing a region whose elites have ruled the country for over 40 in our 60 years of independence with Buhari actively involved in this period. A region with so many billionaires including the world’s richest black man. Shouldn’t every northern politician be ashamed? Where is the Sultan? Where are the religious and cultural leaders? Where is the loquacious Junaid Mohammed? The Sule Lamidos and Kwankwansos who led the opposition against Jonathan in the guise of fighting for northern interest? They have all gone mute even as the citizens they pretend to lead are slaughtered in thousands. The truth is that we cannot continue pretending. Someone had to press that button and if takes Abaribe to ring the bell then the northern senators should have given him a standing ovation and proceed to offer solutions. And just like Festus Keyamo said the ruling APC, the northern leaders and indeed Nigerians as a

Blog, Essays, Monishots

For Jacob Zuma, it is a long overdue farewell.

Sometimes by losing a battle you find a new way to win the war ~ Donald Trump Any informed political observer should know that it was never going to end well for the most colourful and controversial South African President since the end of apartheid in 1994.  Jacob Gedleyihlekisa Zuma can rightly be described as the proverbial cat with nine lives. Born into poverty in the KwaZulu-Natal region of the country, his father was a policeman while his mother was a domestic worker, the boy who had little formal education was to rise to the glorious pinnacle of South Africa’s intricate politics after several struggles. But of course like they say, every story that has a beginning will surely have an end. Trouble had been brewing for quite a long time with the once exiled leader waltzing through most of the obstacles like he would do in his favourite pastime of dancing. Having been dogged by several controversies including trials for rape and bribery all through his political life, Jacob Zuma must have thought all the strife had ended when he was sworn in as South Africa’s President in May 2009. Indeed so it seemed, he was allowed to settle in and had little problems in the early years of his administration. However, an indication of where his presidency was headed turned up in March 2012 when the Supreme Court of Appeal ruled that the Democratic Alliance (an opposition party) could challenge a previous court ruling that let him off some corruption charges. Another corruption scandal erupted in March 2014 when the Ombudsman stated that part of the $15 million refurbishments at Zuma’s luxurious residence was unlawful and ordered him to repay same. Buoyed by the likelihood of an electoral victory in the upcoming presidential polls, a stubborn Zuma was to ignore this order which ultimately proved to be his Achilles heel. If anyone thought that Zuma’s travails would cease when the ANC won a majority of votes in the May 2014 polls to ensure he will have another five-year tenure as South Africa’s Numero Uno the person had another think coming. That notion once again proved to be illusory two years later as the country’s highest court ruled that Zuma had trampled on the constitution by refusing to reimburse part of the tax-payers funds used to renovate his private home. He was subsequently ordered him to refund some of the money. The recalcitrant leader apologised in a national broadcast over the issue which he admitted had “caused a lot of frustration and confusion” and promised to abide by the ruling but still denied any wrongdoing. That public address appeared to trigger a roller coaster of woes for Zuma because less than a month on, another court ruled that prosecutors acted “irrationally” by dropping 18 charges of over 700 fraudulent payments brought against him in 2009. The decision was to be reviewed thus opening an avenue for the charges to be reinstated. That chapter was supposed to be the last straw that broke the camel’s back. But Zuma clung on. As his party lost further ground when the opposition took key cities in the municipal elections of 2016, some cabinet ministers called for his resignation in a rowdy meeting that was reportedly close to fisticuffs. Zuma then pulled the same old wool over their eyes by blaming the west for his travails. How often have we seen African leaders pull off that obsolete stunt? In the end attempts to remove him as president failed. The onslaught continued as the opposition parties mainly the Democratic Alliance and the fierce Julius Malema who leads the Economic Freedom Fighters continued to call on Zuma to step down. Indeed Zuma faced about three no-confidence votes in 2016 but still came through all. And in a calmer 2017 he narrowly escaped once more when another no-confidence vote was defeated by 198 to 177 votes in a secret vote that held in parliament. However, calls for his resignation from his party continued unabated and by October 2017 the country’s apex court upheld an April 2016 High Court ruling to reinstate corruption charges against Zuma. It was coming thick and fast, and in the run-up to December 2017 date to elect a new party president Ivor Chipkin, an Associate Professor at the Public Affairs Research Institute (PARI) and a leading public affairs analyst penned an op-ed for the New York Times in which he detailed the president’s corrupt romance with the notorious Gupta family and described his 9 year era as “a decade of leadership that has seen Africa’s oldest liberation movement become a caricature of corruption and factionalism”. It now appears that the election was the beginning of the end for Zuma as an equally radiant Cyril Ramaphosa defeated Dlamini-Zuma, the president’s ex-wife and preferred candidate, to become the ANC leader. Constitutionally, Zuma’s tenure should run till 2019, but given the crisis within the ruling party and of course Ramaphosa’s overt political ambition there was little hope of dousing the increasing tension. An unsavoury twilight loomed for the man who had become known as the “Teflon President”. Now the die is cast after the parliament postponed the state of the nation address, the ANC held a marathon meeting for about 13 hours and unanimously agreed that President Jacob Zuma should throw in the towel. A letter to this effect was personally delivered to him on February 13, 2017, by the party’s secretary general Ace Magashule who also held a press conference to announce same. Going by the tradition of African leaders as recently exemplified by the ‘Mugabe palace coup’ many expect that Zuma will cling on to his office given that his fifth wife had previously said that “it’s about to get ugly”, an indication that her husband is going nowhere. However, the shining examples of Nigeria’s Goodluck Jonathan and Ghana’s John Mahama must be nurtured to endure. A leader should accept defeat in good faith, be it external or internal. It, therefore, behooves prominent

Join our essay competition.

This will close in 13 seconds

Solverwp- WordPress Theme and Plugin

Scroll to Top