service

Essays, Writers

New Service Chiefs: Twists, Expectations And The Way Forward by Emmanuel Oluka.

Introduction Of a truth, I had decided to write on the silhouette challenge that has been spreading like wild harmattan fire on social media; but, after my stream of thoughts rehearsed an unusual confluence, I surprisingly reneged on my decision, and I’m happy I did so. Nigerians have indeed been distracted enough by mundane things to the extent that important news as the replacement of the service chiefs after so much hue and cry, does not generate the needed engagements, much as the silhouette challenge has done. The silhouette challenge unsurprisingly became the cynosure of all eyes in the wake of the ravaging insecurity situation in the country – one that touches on the lives of every citizen and should’ve been taken with every seriousness it deserves. These distractions inadvertently become a plus to the present administration because it takes away some pressure from them. Anyway, it is what it is already. The replacement of the service chiefs followed various calls by Nigerians for the removal of the former military officers owing to the unabating insecurity situation in the country. From the Boko Haram insurgency in the North-East to rural banditry in the North-West to herdsmen militancy in the North-Centre, to kidnapping and various forms of criminalities in other parts of the country; insecurity remains unyielding and continues to prove a hard nut to crack. The Twists and Turns… As of 1st December 2020, it had been the third-(3rd) time the senate had called on the president to remove the service chiefs and replace them with new ones. The first (call) was in January 2020, when they had deliberated on a motion on national security challenges and the need to reshuffle the nation’s security architecture. A similar call was made in July 2020, yet the resolutions were hinged on debates on insecurity on both occasions. The lawmakers called on President Buhari to dismiss the then service chiefs and bring new ones on grounds that they were bereft of fresh ideas to quell insecurity and that their tenure had expired. The senate’s third call was in December 2020 after the Zabarmari rice farm massacre of over forty-(40) farmers in the Jere Local Government Area of Borno state. Even the house of representatives at that point issued a resolution for the president to appear before the members to address the security situation in the country. But characteristically, the president did not budge; he continued to play the ostrich. To shock you, the president, through his spokesperson Femi Adesina, at one occasion said Nigerians have reasons to be grateful as the situation was better than it was before the ascension to power of this administration. Buhari’s body language, then, reflected an ex-head of state and general who cared less about the oath he swore to protect the lives and property of citizens; which, incidentally, remain the primary objective of the government. Yes, Buhari apologists and their shenanigans maintain that the president is the commander in chief; he commands the armed forces, and so, he takes decisions for them in the manner he likes. But these apologists should also know that when the senior officers stay put for so long a time, that also creates some challenge(s) for officers behind, because, they may not have the prospect to look forward to rising through the ranks. Could this lead to mutiny? Your guess may be good as mine. But just when Nigerians felt so tired of the agitation, the big news came; President Buhari on Tuesday, 26th January 2021, announced the new service chiefs following the resignation of the former officers. General Ibrahim Attahiru replaced Lieutenant General Tukur Yusuf Buratai as chief of army staff, Major-General Leo Irabor replaced General Abayomi Olonisakin as chief of defence staff, Air Vice Marshal Isiaka Oladayo Amao replaced Air Marshal Sadique Abubakar as chief of air staff, and Rear Admiral Awwal Zubairu Gambo replaced Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ekwe Ibas as chief of naval staff. The four-(4) new service chiefs, on the one hand, saw two-(2) from the South, and two-(2) from the North; while on the other hand, two-(2) are Muslims and two-(2), Christians. But to a cross-section of Nigerians, they had questioned the president for once again excluding the south-east geopolitical zone in this appointment; they maintain that a particular section of the country continues to dominate the security council of the country. However, that will be a discussion for another day. Notwithstanding, make no mistake; the service chiefs have just only been nominated, not approved; this is because the president had written the National Assembly and forwarded their names for onward confirmation. Until the senate reconvenes on 9th February 2020, to confirm the names of the service chiefs following the provisions of section 218 of the 1999 constitution (as amended) and section 18 (1) and (3) of the Armed Forces Act, Nigeria cannot say the president has appointed new service chiefs. This informed why, a human rights lawyer, Femi Falana (SAN) had faulted Buhari’s appointment of the new service chiefs and that may have necessitated the president’s ex-post factor legislative approval when he wrote the national assembly afterward. The new service chiefs will go through screening by the National Assembly. So, it remains to be seen whether it shall be a constitutional duty or a vindictive matter, following the manner the president ignored the National assembly’s repeated calls for a rejig of the military officers. Let us also remember that the National Assembly had shown a propensity to flex their muscles in recent times considering its rejection of Ibrahim Magu, the embattled (acting) Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) after the president requested that the Senate approve his nomination. But by and large, the legislative and the executive arms of government should eschew politics and look at the bigger picture; which is, working together for the greater good of Nigerians to defeat the common enemy called insecurity. Despite the time it took the president to heed the call to remodel the security apparatus,

Essays, Writers

The Appointment Of New Service Chiefs: A Possible Security Breakthrough by Oluremi Daniel.

  Nigeria, our dear country, has been through a lot of problems and issues as a nation. These issues range from corruption, economic and political instability as well as insecurity. The latter can be called the chief of all our problems as a country because a nation without peace and security will most likely suffer strain in its other sectors. Examples of our insecurity issues include multiple abductions and ritual killings, intertribal skirmish, herdsmen intrusions, bandit attacks, the ironic terrorism of citizens by the Nigerian Police and Armed Forces, and of course, the infamous Boko Haram insurgency in the northeast. The insurgency, in particular, has been raging for the past 11 years, has led to the death of at least 36,000 people, and has displaced another 2 million people [1]! However, the “news” of our insecurity issues is no longer new. What is new, is the appointment of service chiefs by President Muhammadu Buhari on Tuesday, 26th of January after the sacking resignation and retirement of the previously existing service chiefs. As disclosed by the Special Adviser to the President on Media and Publicity, Femi Adesina, “ President Buhari has accepted the immediate resignation of the Service Chiefs, and their retirement from service. Those involved are General Abayomi Olonisakin, Lieutenant-General Tukur Buratai, Vice Admiral Ibok Ekwe Ibas, and Air Marshall Sadique Abubakar.” They were relieved of their duties by Major General Leo Irabor (as Chief of Defence Staff), Major General I. Attahiru (as Chief of Army Staff), Rear Admiral A.Z. Gambo (as Chief of Naval Staff) and Air Vice Marshall I.O. Amao (as Chief of Air Staff) respectively [2]. The changes were not unprecedented, as there has been a clamour for the President to replace the chiefs who he appointed almost 6 years ago in 2015 to inject fresh blood into the system [2]. More importantly, the former service chiefs were generally considered inefficient and incompetent by many Nigerians [3]. Why? Before analysing the new people in charge as well as the prospects and expectations of the country at large we must assess the performance of the replaced ones. Buhari, was already a retired major general before he contested for and won the Presidential election in 2015. Among the numerous promises he put forth back then, a “change” in the insecurity in the country was thought to become the obvious forte of the Buhari administration, seeing his past profession. However, instead of shoving terrorism and insurgency out the door, which was Buhari’s unique and strongest selling point back in 2015, the situation worsened [3]. Every measure that was initiated only brought more problems, and the cancer of terrorism took new forms, metastasizing and mutating from terrorism to banditry, worsening insurgency, kidnapping, communal strife and open madness on the part of criminals [3]. The most annoying part of the whole matter is that, under the watch of these immediate past service chiefs, especially General Abayomi Olonisakin, there were over 40 military operations [3]! This translates to more military operations in the last 5 years than any other time in Nigerian history, including the Nigerian civil war [3]! Some of the nothing-to-show-for operations are Operations Lafiya Dole, Crocodile Smile I and II, Python Dance, Cat Race and Rattle Snake to name a few [3]. Maybe because they thought Nigerians were dumb, these chiefs, in partnership with government were just painting their failures in different milder colours to avoid too much backlash from society. For example, they made use of terms like “technically defeated”, “degraded” or “decimated” when addressing their fight against Boko Haram when we all know they haven’t made much progress in dissolving the 11-year contention [3]. This cover-up schemes inevitably led to, as Reuben Abati, a politician and former chairman of The Guardian newspaper brilliantly confirmed “no substantial progress, but amounted to nothing more than motion without movement, empty rhetoric and overt politicization of military strategy”. Also, in 5 years, many soldiers deserted the warfront and generals complained about the terrorists’ access to better equipment and motivation, unlike the Nigerian army [3]. All of a sudden, the military became very vocal on social media, especially Twitter [3]! Hilariously, President Buhari thanked the outgoing service chiefs for what he calls their “overwhelming achievements in our efforts at bringing enduring peace to our dear country” [2]. This statement received criticism from people like Kabir Adamu, a security expert who had this to say, “ It would be a bit difficult really for Nigerians to be convinced that the immediate past service chiefs recorded overwhelming achievements”. Reuben also added, “The President talked about their “overwhelming achievements”. “Overwhelming” is a two-sided word; it can be positive or negative!” Well, out with the old and in with the new! The fresh cycle of chiefs seems to raise the hopes of Nigerians. The appointments have been received positive reactions from the likes of Nyesom Wike, Governor of Rivers State, Ayodele Fayose, former governor of Ekiti State and even the Igbo sociocultural group, Ohanaeze Ndigbo [4]. Also, their profiles are interesting and encouraging at least. The most impressive of them is Major General Leo Irabor. The Chief of Defence Staff is well educated with a degree in Engineering from the Obafemi Awolowo University and 2 Masters degrees from outside the country. He also studied in different Military Colleges including the Harvard Kennedy School of Government Executive Programme in the United States [5]. Since they are still new and we are yet to see any changes, there have been efforts taken by them to help the country. When they met Buhari last week, Irabor was reported as having said that he and his team are determined to “add value” [3]. In fact, on Sunday 31st of January, Irabor and his team went on a visit to Borno State and they engaged with stakeholder communities [3]. These chiefs also seem close to each other and this is very important in ensuring synchronization of the Armed Forces. Apart from the tenacious Boko Haram menace, they are also expected to

Join our essay competition.

This will close in 13 seconds

Solverwp- WordPress Theme and Plugin

Scroll to Top